I am thinking of the persentage with which arthouse films may boost or annoy the audience of ordinary viewers. And I jum up to the same precise conclusion, that our genres may be freely estimated by our colleagues, of similar thematic background and capacities. There should exist pride in screen proficiency, as it may be represented at social categories. Masters and disciples are undoubtedly interlaced and mutually excited of one another, in thematic groups. It is of audacity and dare, to notice talents; as myself in person, I was occasionally offered laurus to this exact degree (in spite if that my genres had been elaborated enough or not, some of my early works were estimated "par avance"). I thankfully and warmly recall such screen masters and refined criticists, as Tonino Guerra, Razlogov, Ryabikov, Kira Muratova whom I happened to encounter in person, when in Moscow. I thankfully recollect Lanoviy, Boris Khmelnitsky (spouse of Vertinskaya), Eshpay (spouse of Simonova) and several others of Moscow cinematographists... Of genres of the European cinema, I am up to ceaselessly broadcast...